From:                                                      dbroyles@nclplaw.org on behalf of National Center For Law & Policy [dbroyles@nclplaw.org]

Sent:                                                        Friday, March 21, 2014 4:35 PM

To:                                                            dcarter@nclplaw.org

Subject:                                                  The Silencing of the Lambs: Gay Gestapo Scores An Ominous Victory In Arizona.

 

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here

You're receiving this email because of your relationship with The National Center For Law & Policy. Please confirm your continued interest in receiving email from us.

 

You may unsubscribe if you no longer wish to receive our emails.

  

Freedom Forum

A Monthly E-publication of

The National Center for Law & Policy 
 March 2014

In This Issue

· The Silencing of the Lambs: Gay Gestapo Scores An Ominous Victory In Arizona.

· California "Bathroom Bill" Repeal Falls Short, But Effort Continues

· Calling All Christian Leaders: When the "Political" Infringes on the "Biblical" Christians Must Engage

 

The Silencing of the Lambs: Gay Gestapo Scores An Ominous Victory In Arizona

 

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer's veto of much-needed revisions to the state's Religious Freedom Restoration Act (SB 1062) should chill the blood of every American citizen who understands the fundamental importance of religious liberty and freedom of conscience. 

 

The law that was in place for 15 years, exists in 18 states, and is modeled on the Federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, simply requires the government to show a "compelling state interest" before infringing on the religious freedom of its citizens.  SB 1062 only clarified the existing law in two minor respects.  It would have given religious business owners the same protections as individuals and would have protected individuals from lawsuits from other private individuals, not just the government.  That was it. 

 

And in fact, as religious freedom struggles under increasing assaults, there is a profound need for greater religious freedom protections like SB 1062.  One marker is the growing governmental trend to coerce businesses to participate in gay weddings and commitment ceremonies.  A New Mexico photographer, a Washington State florist, and an Oregon baker have all been sued or dragged before their state human rights commission simply because they refused to violate their deeply-held biblical religious beliefs about marriage. 

 

As you can see, the primary issue at stake here is actually religious freedom, not gay rights.  Should the government have the power to coerce individuals to violate their religious conscience?  No.  In fact, the Arizona law, which does not mention homosexuality, protects religious freedom from all challengers, not just anti-religious gay legal activists.  Yet the media lied, calling the law "anti-gay."  And, unfortunately, media propaganda has been very compelling, convincing millions of thoughtless Americans that gay is the new black.  If you disagree, you are a homophobic bigot!

 

Sadly, many politicians, who had just voted in favor of the bill, withered in their support under the extreme duress of the media's hysterical misinformation campaign.  Apparently the straw that broke Jan Brewer's back and led to her veto of the religious freedom improvements was the NFL's threat to pull the Super Bowl from Arizona.  Politicians were not the only persons pressured.  An Arizona business owner and his children received vile death threats because they publicly supported the bill. 

 

Tammy Bruce, a conservative gay commentator writing in a Washington Times editorial, expressed her support for Arizona's religious freedom bill and her alarm at how houses of worship are now vulnerable to the "Gay Gestapo."  Bruce argued that SB 1062 "embodied the values every American civil rights movement stood for:  the freedom to live our lives without being punished for who we are."  She called out the left for its effort "to make faith in the public square illegal and dangerous" by employing a strategy "to condition the public into automatically equating faith with bigotry."  Bruce points out that "[F]reedom of conscience is squashed under the jackboot of liberals, all in the Orwellian name of "equality and fairness." Here we are dealing with not just forcing someone to do something for you, but forcing them in the process to violate a sacrament of their faith as well."

 

True tolerance means that religious people in America should be free to hold religious beliefs, practice their faith, express their beliefs in the marketplace of ideas, and live their lives freely without being called names, marginalized, or driven from business.  Yet, as I predicted 20 years ago, the radical gay '"rights" movement, then clamoring for tolerance as an alternative lifestyle, would one day become the aggressively intolerant destroyers of religious freedom once they gained power and control over the means of cultural thought dissemination.  Unfortunately, we have arrived at that day.  The thought police are here.   

 

What happened in Arizona is vitally important and should correctly be viewed as an example of a tipping point in the fight to defend and preserve religious freedom.  Religious freedom is the source and foundation of all other freedoms we enjoy as citizens.  If we lose religious freedom we are well on our way to losing all other freedoms and authentic God-given civil rights. 

 

Perhaps the most deeply disappointing thing is that, just like the majority of the Lutheran pastors in pre-World War II Germany, so many leaders of the lambs have been silenced.  I submit that the most ominous development is the cowardly caving of so many Christian leaders to the existential threat of the "Gay Gestapo."  There is no dignity, honor, or eternal reward in fearing men more than we fear God.  The handwriting is on the wall.  They are coming for your flock and for your pulpit.  What will you do? 

 

California "Bathroom Bill" Repeal Falls Short, But Effort Continues

 

As of the end of February, petitions to repeal what has become known as the "Bathroom Bill" had been reviewed by county officials, and the California Secretary of State reported that 487,484 signatures were valid - 17,276 short of the 504,760 needed to qualify the referendum for the November ballot.  Proponents of AB 1266 (which allows children to gender self-identify, use bathrooms and locker rooms of the opposite sex, and participate on opposite gender sports teams) were celebrating while opponents were evaluating what could have been done to gain the relatively small number of signatures needed.

 

The Privacy for All Students Coalition (PFAS) is currently challenging those results to determine why more than 131,000 signatures of the 620,000 raw signatures collected were rejected. They remain confident that at least the number needed to qualify (17,276 of 131,000) will be found to actually be valid when the county results are reviewed.  PFAS' press release stated, "We knew that we would have to fight to have every valid signature counted."  Kevin Snider, attorney for Pacific Justice Institute, which is assisting the referendum effort, said, "Many counties set a very high threshold to declare a signature valid. But the courts have repeatedly set a standard that is much friendlier to the voter offering his or her signature." The referendum proponents will have to ask judges to step in to assure that all valid signatures are counted.

 

So, does AB 1266 now go into effect? While the claim will be made that the bill will take effect because the threshold was not met with the certified results, under the law proponents have a 21-day period to challenge those results. The process to review the county results has already begun. 

 

Calling All Christian Leaders:  When the "Political" Infringes on the "Biblical" Christians Must Engage

 

If there is one word I would ban from Christendom's vocabulary when discussing whether to address the challenging social moral issues of our day, it would be the term "political."  I have often heard Christian leaders say things like, "Oh, we don't discuss 'political' issues in our church; we don't want to be divisive or offend anyone." 

 

I recently gently admonished a church elder when he recited a similar mantra to me, "These issues were 'biblical' issues for thousands of years before they became 'political' issues quite recently in our culture.  The primary reason they are 'political' issues today is because our culture's values have been turned upside down, but that doesn't mean they are not also biblical issues the church ought to address."  Simply relabeling biblical issues 'political' is not a valid basis for the church's decision to ignore them, is it?  Yet that is exactly what has happened. 

 

I submit that, sadly, many evangelical pastors have quite intentionally mislabeled many clearly biblical issues 'political' so they can conveniently avoid dealing with them from the pulpit. I can't tell you how many watered-down sermons I have heard over the past 20 years where pastors have side-stepped, glossed over, and even contradicted clear biblical moral teaching in important areas like marriage, divorce, abortion, sexual purity, homosexuality, etc.  Why? 

 

First, they compromise because of extreme social pressure and fear.  Modern culture is very powerfully attempting to squeeze everything and everyone into its insidiously pagan mold, including our churches and our pastors.  And I believe that, rather than resisting this dark pressure, boldly and courageously telling the culture "where to get off," and preaching the full truth-the full counsel of God-pastors are far too often fearfully and shamefully allowing our godless culture to dictate to them what they do preach and don't preach from our pulpits today.  As my good friend Pastor Jim Garlow recently said, "We need pastors who fear no one but the Lord and who speak nothing but the truth."  Evil prevails when good men do nothing. 

 

Second, we have adopted an unbiblical view of love.  Under the sway of a diluted and distorted vision of love" we have created a false idol of being "nice" at all costs.  We have lost the ability to winsomely speak the truth in love (Eph. 4:15) to an increasingly truthless culture.  Yet, quite ironically, in the name of love we are actually being profoundly unloving.  And it is precisely true Christian love that we actually sacrificed-it is deeply unloving to not give someone the whole truth.  In fact, I believe that withholding truth from others is actually quite mean, if not hateful.   

 

Thus, we are increasingly hearing watered-down, compromised, and powerless Gospels.  And, until our Christian leaders start fearing God more than they fear man, it will only get worse.  We have lowered the bar so far in many evangelical churches that at least one end of the bar is dragging on the ground. 

 

I believe the answer is simple.  We must biblically repent of our moral and spiritual weakness and compromise and, fueled by the power of the Holy Spirit again, start preaching the full counsel of God-even the hard parts-especially the hard parts!  As I recently told a group of pastors, we must fight against all forms of spiritual compromise and return to a high view of God and a high view of the authority of the Word of God.  Until we do, the clearly "biblical" will continue to be falsely relabeled and excluded as "political."  And a culture and people that desperately need to understand and experience both the holiness of God and the love of God will continue to suffer the consequences.  

A New Mexico photographer, a Washington State florist, and an Oregon baker have all been sued or dragged before their state human rights commission simply because they refused to violate their deeply-held biblical religious beliefs about marriage.

 

 

"[F]reedom of conscience is squashed under the jackboot of liberals, all in the Orwellian name of "equality and fairness." Here we are dealing with not just forcing someone to do something for you, but forcing them in the process to violate a sacrament of their faith as well." 

 

Tammy Bruce

 

 

 

True tolerance means that religious people in America should be free to hold religious beliefs, practice their faith, express their beliefs in the marketplace of ideas, and live their lives freely without being called names, marginalized, or driven from business. 

 

 

 

The handwriting is on the wall.  They are coming for your flock and for your pulpit.  What will you do?  

 

Yoga, Purely Physical or is it Religious?  

See the powerful 

video of Dean's

presentation at Horizon Christian Fellowship (2nd video listed).

 

 

Donate Now

 

Click here to support the Sedlock v. Baird legal defense fund to help cover appeal costs to keep yoga out of the public schools.  

Pray for favor as the appeal moves forward and for spiritual protection for all involved!

 

 

 

NCLP Voter's Guide

Get your copy of NCLP's popular free non-partisan Voter's Guide! 

 

 

"We knew that we would have to fight to have every valid signature counted."  

 

PFAS Press Release 

 

 

 

If there is one word I would ban from Christendom's vocabulary when discussing whether to address the challenging social moral issues of our day, it would be the term "political." 

 

 

 

I can't tell you how many watered-down sermons I have heard over the past 20 years where pastors have side-stepped, glossed over, and even contradicted clear biblical moral teaching in important areas like marriage, divorce, abortion, sexual purity, homosexuality, etc.  Why?

 

 

 

NCLP PPP

By God's favor and grace, requests for the NCLP's powerful booklet for pastors continue to pour in from all over the U.S.A.! 

 

 

Modern culture is very powerfully attempting to squeeze everything and everyone into its insidiously pagan mold, including our churches and our pastors.

 

 

"We need pastors who fear no one but the Lord and who speak nothing but the truth." 

 

Pastor Jim Garlow   

 

 

Under the sway of a diluted and distorted vision of "love" we have created a false idol of being "nice" at all costs.  We have lost the ability to winsomely speak the truth in love (Eph. 4:15) to an increasingly truthless culture.

 

 

 

We have lowered the bar so far in many evangelical churches that at least one end of the bar is dragging on the ground. 

 

 

 

We must biblically repent of our moral and spiritual weakness and compromise and, fueled by the power of the Holy Spirit again, start preaching the full counsel of God-even the hard parts-especially the hard parts!

 

The National Center for Law & Policy is a non-profit 501(c)(3) legal defense organization dedicated to the protection and promotion of religious freedom, parental rights, and other civil liberties. The NCLP engages in constitutional litigation in state and federal courts and is also active in the areas of public policy and education.  


For more information about The National Center For Law & Policy, please visit our website at  

www.nclplaw.org

 

All of our valuable legal services are provided to our clients pro bono (for free).  We rely on the generous gifts of others to operate our legal ministry.  To make your secure charitable tax-deductible donation, please click on this link: http://www.nclplaw.org/donate/ or you may contact Darlene Carter at (760) 747-4529 or dcarter@nclplaw.org to set up a regular monthly gift or for more information.  Thank you!

 

The National Center for Law & Policy

539 West Grand Avenue

Escondido, California 92025

Tel:  (760) 747-4529

Fax:  (760) 747-4505

E-mail:  info@nclplaw.org

 Web:  www.nclplaw.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forward email

This email was sent to dcarter@nclplaw.org by dbroyles@nclplaw.org |  

The National Center For Law & Policy | 539 West Grand Avenue | Escondido | CA | 92025